This study used biocomposite aesthetic braided brackets and archwires as well as commercially available ones for comparison and verification of the results in orthodontic. To produce biocomposite archwires a flexible polymeric shrinkage tube was proposed as a die, resins reinforced with glass fibers, whereas pultrusion processes are applied for the production of brackets, epoxy reinforced with braided glass fibers. The influence of a different bracket design on the sliding characteristics of an arch guided tooth was determined using a 0.022² straight archwire slot system. The Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) images and geometries of brackets and opposing archwires are given the prime importance for this attempt. Several independent samples of each bracket-archwire combination were tested. Guiding archwires with different cross-sections were used in the simulated sliding mechanics. The experiment is designed to investigate the performance of biocomposite aesthetic brackets and archwires. The sliding force involved in a ligated bracket-archwire combination is measured by self-designed jig for progressive wear damage. The particles of the two soft surfaces change during sliding which causes shearing deformation and ultimately damaged the contact surfaces of composite matrix of braided aesthetic biocomposite brackets and archwires.  Although penetrations through the soft matrix are observed on many brackets and archwires, the glass-fiber reinforcement within the biocomposite brackets and archwires is undamaged for most of the conditions tested but exposed severely. This finding implies that the risk of glass fiber release during clinical use would not be eliminated.