The research that we have developed on the Correlation of Development of Persons with Disabilities including Leprosy in relation to Accessibility and Independent Living and Community Engagement in Several Cities in Sumatra, Java, Sulawesi and East Nusa Tenggara compared to the Experience in New Zealand, brings one understanding of what citizens' duties are for. in maintaining national resilience and security in the welfare of all citizens of the country without differentiating them from one another. But there are still those who still don't understand or pretend they don't know about this situation. Whereas in the four islands of Indonesia that I mean above, the cultural principles of our people are very caring and often very very concerned, but they are often different in practice, very sad. Meanwhile in other countries it is often said to be very "individualistic" but in practice they really care, or is it because their quality of life is getting better? Or is it true that their life ethics as citizens are already very good? Everything can be measured from various parameters such as disability friendliness, accessibility, stigma and budget provision for each central government program including corporations or government or private institutions and the community. The research methodology is a qualitative method, direct observation in Indonesia, including in the cities of Auckland, Wellington, Rotorua and New Plymouth in New Zealand. Including countries other than the two countries above. We can observe from public transportation, places of public facilities in both cities and regions, including buildings of worship of every religion. Of course, the results of the bias are compared well, for example, religious buildings, will Indonesia, which is known as a religious country, be better than New Zealand? This challenge will be very important as the citizens are very religious.