Track: Construction Management

Abstract

This article analyses the impact of the coronavirus epidemic among Construction Small-Medium Enterprises - CoSMEs in the UK. A global and UK effect context-analysis is given and contrasted using a multivariate scrutiny of factors determining success or failure and the extent of covariance among contributory factors leading to closure as well as survival of the CoSMEs.  First the reveals that within the UK, government’s interventional measures had a mixed effect. In most cases the measures were deemed to be inadequate and tool late to stop the failure of most CoSME’s while a substantial number survived at the back of government’s interventional measures such as the furlough schemes. Secondly, an inventory of the specific and multidimensional measures attributed to mitigate total failure of CoSMEs is drawn including a review of the perceived benefits such as minimising extent of total closure or declared volume of bankruptcies. Third, it is observed that government’s decisive decisions contributed to the slowdown of the economy in particular construction activity but ranked among the interventional measures is the ‘bounceability’ driven measures which offered a soft landing for many CoSMEs. The study concludes that crisis-mitigating policy measures – CMPM, are necessary for the short- and long-term recovery and performance of the UK economy.  Understanding the composition of these measures and their rank order is critical to economic recovery.This article analyses the impact of the coronavirus epidemic among Construction Small-Medium Enterprises - CoSMEs in the UK. A global and UK effect context-analysis is given and contrasted using a multivariate scrutiny of factors determining success or failure and the extent of covariance among contributory factors leading to closure as well as survival of the CoSMEs.  First the reveals that within the UK, government’s interventional measures had a mixed effect. In most cases the measures were deemed to be inadequate and tool late to stop the failure of most CoSME’s while a substantial number survived at the back of government’s interventional measures such as the furlough schemes. Secondly, an inventory of the specific and multidimensional measures attributed to mitigate total failure of CoSMEs is drawn including a review of the perceived benefits such as minimising extent of total closure or declared volume of bankruptcies. Third, it is observed that government’s decisive decisions contributed to the slowdown of the economy in particular construction activity but ranked among the interventional measures is the ‘bounceability’ driven measures which offered a soft landing for many CoSMEs. The study concludes that crisis-mitigating policy measures – CMPM, are necessary for the short- and long-term recovery and performance of the UK economy.  Understanding the composition of these measures and their rank order is critical to economic recovery.